-.

 

 

Programme Programme notes

Click on the image below to download a pdf of the PANO programme.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Chair
Bertrand Vieillard-Baron
Director General, French Nuclear Energy Society, Paris

Welcome Addresses
Buyelwa Sonjica
Minister of Minerals & Energy

The Nuclear Option

Nuclear power—a science for all: should the international nuclear community promote its benign use in developing countries?
Philippe Garderet
Scientific Vice President, AREVA, France

Geopolitics and the role of nuclear power: the interplay of economic growth, energy availability, and national strategic energy planning both globally and regionally.
Andrew Kenny
Independent Commentator

A summary: the options for nuclear power in Africa
Alan McDonald
Programme Liaison Officer, Department of Nuclear Energy, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

A South African Perspective

A perspective from the ground: assessing the practicality of nuclear power for Africa.
Rob Adam
Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear Energy Corporation of South Africa

The case for nuclear power: a combination of economics and logistics.
Thembani Bukula
Director Electricity Regulation, National Electricity Regulator of South Africa

Different Perspectives of Nuclear Safety
Prof Chang-Sun Kang
Department of Nuclear Engineering
Seoul National University;
Member of the International Nuclear Safety Group (INSAG)

Lunch at Hôtel Le Vendôme

Technological and Structural Options

Chair
Gert Claassen
Manager International Marketing, Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria

Yves Guenon
Business Development Director, Plants Sector, AREVA NP
Jerry Hopwood
Vice-President, Reactor Development, AECL
Nils Breckenridge
Manager, Strategy and Marketing
Westinghouse Electric Company, USA
Chang-Sun Kang
Department of Nuclear Engineering
Seoul National University
Member of the International Nuclear Safety Group (INSAG)

Welcome dinner

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Requirements for a Nuclear Power Programme

Chair
Alan McDonald
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Managing the fuel cycle: the options.
Henri Zaccai
Vice President, Sales Development and Marketing, AREVA NC

Operational requirements: What is required in terms of infrastructure, technology transfer, and plant operation and maintenance?
David Boath
International and Reactor Development Director, Amec NNC, UK

Finance:
The challenges of financing an African nuclear plant?
Anne Renzi
Director, Deputy Head of Export Finance, AREVA NP
Ron Cullen
Vice-President, Projects, AECL, Canada

Lunch at Hôtel Le Vendôme

Each discussion will be followed by a short break for refreshments. The proceedings will be recorded, and copies of the recordings will be available.

Programme notes

The present
Of the 442 nuclear power plants in operation in 31 countries, just two are in Africa: Koeberg-1 and Koeberg-2 in South Africa. Both are 900 MW(e) PWRs. Of the 28 currently under construction none is in Africa. However, one of the promising new reactor designs reaching the prototype stage is African - South Africa's Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR).

The future
Nuclear power is projected to grow fastest in developing Asian countries where annual electricity consumption per capita is currently small, specifically China, India and Pakistan. 28 new nuclear power plants are currently under construction, equivalent to 6% of existing capacity. Some 38 plants are firmly planned, equivalent to 10% of capacity. Of the last 31 reactors connected to the grid, 21 are in the Far East and South Asia.

PBMR, or some other innovative nuclear power system, could provide Africa with the opportunity to make a technological leap-frog, thereby avoiding the intermediate steps that industrialized countries with long-established nuclear power programmes had to take.

Energy policy
To achieve sustainable development, one of the first tasks for Africa is to bring energy, particularly electricity, to the millions of people without it. Both electricity consumption and production will have to increase significantly.

Off-grid renewable energy is often seen as the best option for bringing power to the rural poor. But rural electrification can complement these technologies. To meet the growing urban and peri-urban demand for electricity, large centralized power generation is needed. Under the scenario of sustainable development, a role for nuclear power in Africa should be considered.

The economics
The question "Is nuclear power economic?" depends on the indigenous energy resources of a country, on the infrastructure and human resources, on the cost of the alternatives to nuclear power, on the environmental constraints, and on the country's energy security policies. Because new nuclear power plants are relatively expensive to build but relatively inexpensive to operate, it also depends on whether the investment environment requires short- or long-term returns. Where governments are direct investors, they can generally take a longer-term view than private firms in a liberalized market. Governments can also directly incorporate into their energy investment choices non-market considerations like energy security or environmental impact.

For the increased use of nuclear power in Africa, it will be necessary to bridge the gap between the economies of scale that favour large nuclear plants and the smaller electrical grids and capital capabilities of many African countries. Possibilities are, first, new small and medium-size reactor designs and, second, integration of the electricity grids of neighbouring countries.

Small & medium reactors (SMRs) and
off-site refuelling

Several advanced SMR designs that could be more cost-effective for Africa are moving towards implementation. Combining SMRs with off-site refuelling could further improve the economics. The unloading of spent nuclear fuel and loading of fresh fuel would be done in a supplier country with a full fuel cycle. The spent fuel would, therefore, remain the responsibility of the supplier country. This would remove the need for a developing country to build a final repository for high-level nuclear waste. Such a scenario is likely to make a reactor more proliferation resistant and encourage support for the developing country's nuclear programme.

A related alternative is that of straightforward fuel leasing. In this case refuelling occurs on-site, but the fuel is owned by the supplier country, and the spent fuel is the supplier country's responsibility. Again this would remove the need for each developing country to build a final repository for high-level nuclear waste. It may even be possible to lease a SMR itself. The leasing concept could also be extended to leasing services, where, for example, a barge-mounted SMR is used to supply electricity, heat and/or desalinated seawater, while the supplier retains responsibility, not just for the fuel and reactor, but also for the full operation of the plant.

Regionalization & integration
The larger the nuclear plant the greater the economies of scale. But many African countries do not have the necessary capital and electricity demand to support a large plant. Regionalization and integration could provide a solution.

Also the greater the number of nuclear plants supported by the national infrastructure, the lower is the per unit (or per kilowatt-hour) cost of that infrastructure. Nuclear power infrastructure includes the institutional framework and legislation within which nuclear facilities operate, and the industrial, economic, social, technical and scientific capabilities to enable the secure and efficient development, management and operation of nuclear power facilities. These up-front infrastructure investments present a substantial requirement, particularly if a country initially needs only a relatively small amount of power from nuclear energy. Cooperation can mitigate the cost of these requirements.

International cooperation
Besides regional cooperation, international cooperation is essential for the development of an African nuclear industry. Although developing countries may well dominate future markets for nuclear power plants, it is developed countries that currently have the most R&D resources and expertise. One of their goals should be to share their resources and expertise for the future needs of developing countries through international cooperation. Providing systems of access to the global nuclear communities' knowledge pool will be a major factor in the promotion of nuclear energy in Africa.

 



Principal sponsor

 

Co-sponsors

 

 

 

In cooperation with

 

Supported by

 

Produced by

 
Powering Africa Executive Meetings are produced by EnergyNet Limited